Nothing unites us like love but against our enemies, nothing like hatred. We are witnessing the results of it as history repeats itself again – threats from the experts at hating their enemies right before our eyes, from autoc­ratic leaders to rageful neigh­bors.

Hate unites because it kills the conscience with the mindless anger needed to do what cannot or should not be done with a conscience. But is it that loving an enemy makes us too weak to do what we think must be done to survive or does it show us what we really need to do but we refuse? This is not a religious discussion, even though Jesus taught it, but he also told his followers to buy swords to defend themselves. It is just that nations have a long history of defending themselves out of hatred not love.

Where are the voices today guiding us to love Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping and Kim Jong-un, or should there be? We will take a close look at Jesus’ teaching on this matter, but this is not a religious book. For looking at this teaching only religiously has been part of the problem.

To confront autocracy and rageful neighbors or at least live with them, the kind of love he taught would have to have an anger all its own that unites us. Not just to protect, it must be an anger that allows us to see enemies as equals, not inhuman as the anger of hatred makes us do. The anger of love fights nobly rather than inhu­manely, for it is mindful anger. But what is the methodology behind it? Without allowing us to lose our conscience, it comes from the mind of the heart.    

We cannot be united through it though if it depends on everyone being Christian. Thinking that we must comes from looking at his teaching only through religious eyes. Jesus said that if we do not believe in him, we should at least believe his works. Teaching us to love our enemies was his greatest work for all humanity, believers and nonbelievers alike.

First, we must be able to look at this teaching without any beliefs associated with it, to just focus on the deeper method he taught behind it. If we are Chris­tians or of any other religion, we can do both but should not let our beliefs interfere with the reasoning. Autocracy and rageful neighbors are betting we cannot unite around it, but when approached this way, it does not require a miracle.

To accommodate all readers, I equate the word God with life, the essence of life as a given without reference to any deity behind it. And I pro­pose that life as a whole be given a name, for as offspring of life, each of us has one. And likewise, since each of us produces words, life produces words. Rather than giving life a personal name, I call it Name and its one offspring Word, both without any reference to deity.

At the same time, for Christians, God is the Name and Jesus is the Word, so I refer to God and Jesus as Name and Word also, applicable to all other religions interpreted your own way. I use a story about Name and Word with both sym­bolic meaning about life and spiritual meaning about God. Either way, those who love life or “Name will dwell in it,”[1] and handle “the Word of life”.[2]

Typically, stories are created on the stage of the heart or the mind. This one is written as a screen­play for the mind of the heart. The end notes are not essential to the story and, in fact, being nearly as long, distract from it. So, I recommend reading them and the Indices of Hebrew and Greek after the story, except for the pronunciation of a handful of new words in the indices and possi­bly end note 1, for it explains the method I use in interpre­tation and trans­la­tion of Hebrew and Greek.

The story about Name and Word begins after my autobiog­raphy, which is brief but sets the stage due to contro­versies in my life. They appear to revolve around a surface conflict between cultural traditions, while the real conflict is between those who favor the pluralistic nature of democracy in both cultures and those in both who favor the non-pluralistic nature of autocracy. I use the name Abram and adopt other names for those in my life, except for my brother Terry.

1 - Psalm 69:36, 2 - 1 John 1:1







ACT I – Autobiography

SCENE 1 – Eleven Years Old

SCENE 2 – Thirty-Six Years Old

SCENE 3 – Marriage

SCENE 4 – Denial

SCENE 5 – The Trial

SCENE 6 – Relief from the Court

SCENE 7 – Sixty-Seven Years Old

ACT II.a – The World is Blind

MAIN SET – The Vision-Street

SCENE 1 – Insight

SCENE 2 – Group Insight

SCENE 3 – Insight of the Blind

ACT II.b – The Light of Knowledge

SCENE 1 – The Court of Light

SCENE 2 – A Dispute in the Light

SCENE 3 – The Lineage of the Reborn

SCENE 4 – The First Role of Women

SCENE 5 – The Present Light of Democracies

ACT III – Word-Visions of Names

SCENE 1 – Imprisoning the Light

SCENE 2 – Judging the Light

SCENE 3 – Sentencing the Light

SCENE 4 – The Golden Transparency and Democracy

SCENE 5 – Vision-Fields of Freedom

SCENE 6 – We Were All There

SCENE 7 – Image-Sacrifice

SCENE 8 – The Plan

SCENE 9 – The Mode of Life

SCENE 10 – The Mind of the Heart of Abraham

Appendix A – The Shachaqs

Appendix B – Full Knowledge

Appendix C – Hebrew Names


Index of Sacred Hebrew Words

Index of Sacred Greek Words

Index of Scripture References

Index of Scripture Links

End Notes


Copyright Page

The Mind of the Heart


© 2023 by R. A. Valentine




All rights reserved

Requests for information should

be made to

Visit us at




Library of Congress Control Number: TXu 2-354-935



Digital Edition ISBN:




Permissions listed at the end.